![]() ![]() FlashBlade is the powerhouse for File and Object storage, but if you don't need all that power, a lightweight file function would make FlashArrays more versatile." "Pure Storage FlashArray could improve in the area of cryptographic information in the consoles. The idea is that they would run a basic NFS or CIF share from the controllers. It is not the cheapest one out there, but I'm not directly involved in the figures and negotiations." "The solution could improve by having a multi-tenant feature." "We understand that they're thinking about it, but one of the things that would be nice is if they added some basic file-level capabilities to the platform. Additionally, the solution could improve by having native integration with a cloud provider, such as VMware or Microsoft, this would reduce the need to use third-party solutions to complete the task." "Its price could be cheaper. It could be available as an API to allow seamless integration. For example, if I want to use this storage for a backup from the cloud, I want to have integration with the cloud vendors, such as Microsoft, Oracles, or Amazon. "The price of the solution can improve." "Pure Storage FlashArray could improve the recent file storage capabilities because it is lacking a lot of features." "I would like a feature to integrate with external or cloud solutions. ![]() It's a scalable and stable software." "VMware vSAN is an easy to use and easy to manage storage solution. It's part of the whole system." "Storage virtualization software with a good storage management feature. It is easy to configure, and there is a unified interface, which makes things slightly easier." "We didn't only choose vSAN we chose VMware because of SR-IOV, which is more on the hypervisor level and not on the vSAN storage. Automation is there." "Its ease of use is most valuable. It has storage, policies, application, and DRS policies. It is not necessary to buy some extra devices and talk with other vendors." "The vSAN features we've found most helpful are live application migrations and storage policies. It is easy to implement for us, and it is also easy to maintain for the customers. That's the main point of vSAN and VMware." "It is easy to use. Contact the storage vendor for the full list of arrays supported with various combinations of SRM, SRA and vSphere releases."The valuable feature of the solution is the total hyperconverged facility." "Everyone uses virtualization to more efficiently utilize hardware resources. ![]() ![]() So for example, storage array entries for SRM 5.0 will show only those arrays that are supported with ESXi 5.0. Due to different product release cycles, levels of testing, and partner agreements, not all storage devicesĪlso note that the SRM compatibility matrix for a specific release only lists those arrays that are supported on the VMware SAN compatibility list ( ) with the corresponding version of ESX. VMware works closely with each of its storage partners to drive towards mutual support of SRM at the time of announcement. Please note that the SRM 1.x and 4.0.x versions are now EOL per plan. Please note that NOT all SRAs are certified for SRM 4.1 and SRM 5.0. This document lists the Storage Replication Adapters (SRAs) currently supported by VMware and its storage partners for SRM versions 4.1 and 5.0. VMware Site Recovery Manager software has been tested and deployed in a variety of Storage Area Network (SAN) and Network Attached Storage (NAS) environments. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |